❧ Executive summary
Some data-centre cooling loops use ethylene glycol or propylene glycol for freeze protection. If a glycol mixture reaches soil, stormwater or surface water, the compounds and their additives may alter water quality. Biodegradation of glycols also consumes oxygen and may cause local oxygen depletion under sufficient loading. Consequences depend on release volume, formulation and characteristics of the receiving water.
The environmental fate and oxygen demand of ethylene and propylene glycol have been studied, particularly in airport de-icing runoff. This supports a transferable mechanism but does not measure how often data-centre cooling systems release glycol.

Key findings
- Ethylene glycol is water-miscible and can migrate through soil towards groundwater.
- Microbial breakdown of glycols requires oxygen and may lower dissolved oxygen after substantial loading.
- Propylene glycol should not be regarded as environmentally inert, despite differences from ethylene glycol in human toxicity.
- Antifreeze additives require separate review through product safety data sheets.
- Airport-runoff findings cannot be used directly to assign a data-centre risk score.
How can glycol reach the environment?
Glycol mixtures may circulate in closed cooling loops to prevent freezing in colder conditions. A release can occur at a pipe joint, coil, valve or during servicing.
Once liquid reaches a drain, stormwater network or permeable soil, it may move towards surface water or groundwater. Controlled collection of spent coolant is therefore an important safeguard.
[1] [4] [5]Oxygen demand, water and soil
Microorganisms consume oxygen as they degrade glycols. A sufficiently concentrated local release into a waterbody can increase biochemical oxygen demand and reduce dissolved oxygen. Flow, temperature and dilution determine the actual effect.
Ethylene glycol is mobile in water and often biodegrades relatively rapidly. That does not eliminate short-term local loading, and the fate of formulation additives can differ.
- Reduced dissolved oxygen in heavily loaded receiving waters
- Transport through ditches and stormwater infrastructure
- Possible groundwater exposure depending on the pathway
- Separate hazards associated with additives
Which parameters determine impact?
The word “glycol” is not enough. Identify whether ethylene or propylene glycol is present, its concentration, all additives and the plausible release volume.
- Loop volume and glycol concentration
- Product trade name and safety data sheet
- Containment and discharge or stormwater pathways
- Receiving-water flow and baseline dissolved oxygen
- Soil permeability and groundwater connection
- Other concurrent sources of organic oxygen demand
Prevention and reduction
Glycol circuits should allow early detection and physical recovery of leaked liquid. Spent glycol should not be drained into sewers without an appropriate treatment and authorised acceptance route.
- Select the formulation for performance and environmental properties
- Provide containment, leak sensors and isolation
- Clearly label filling and draining points
- Collect and dispose of spent glycol through authorised channels
- Inspect pipe joints and heat exchangers to a schedule
- Plan how to stop a leak before it enters a watercourse
What can be monitored?
Circuit mass balance, pressure and abnormal topping-up can help identify losses. Where environmental release is suspected, sampling may target glycols, BOD/COD and dissolved oxygen according to the affected pathway.
- Pressure and refill history
- Leak alarm tests and repair history
- BOD/COD and dissolved oxygen if surface water may be affected
- Chemical-specific glycol and additive analysis
- Receiving-water flow and appropriate sample locations
Finnish regulatory context
Finland’s Environmental Protection Act prohibits soil and groundwater pollution. Additional obligations depend on the formulation’s hazard classification and how it is handled and stored.
Containment provisions of Decree 856/2012 apply where the operation falls within its scope. Product safety data sheets and any local environmental or sewer discharge conditions must be reviewed separately.
[4] [5]Documented comparison study – not a data centre
Corsi, Booth and Hall studied airport runoff containing aircraft de-icing chemicals in Wisconsin. The study reported high oxygen demand associated with glycol-containing runoff in receiving streams, illustrating a plausible environmental mechanism.
Airport glycols can spread across broad paved areas; data-centre cooling loops are typically enclosed. The airport release rate or impact magnitude must not be directly attributed to data centres.
[2] [3]Evidence limitations and next steps
This review does not establish the frequency of data-centre glycol leaks or a measured effect at any particular facility. Potential harm must not be portrayed as an observed incident.
Site-specific assessment needs exact formulations, loop inventory, release pathways and information on nearby sensitive waters and groundwater resources.
[1] [2] [3] [4]Open references and scope
Airport runoff studies concern a different release scenario from a closed data-centre cooling circuit.
- ATSDR — Ethylene Glycol: Public Health Statement ↗Environmental fate of ethylene glycol; not an investigation of data-centre leaks.
- US Geological Survey — Corsi, Booth & Hall (2001) ↗Peer-reviewed study of oxygen demand from glycol-bearing airport runoff; analogy, not data-centre evidence.
- Government of Canada — Ethylene glycol, environmental fate ↗Summary of biodegradation, mobility and potential dissolved-oxygen depletion in receiving waters.
- Finlex — Ympäristönsuojelulaki 527/2014 ↗Finnish prohibitions on soil and groundwater pollution.
- Finlex — Valtioneuvoston asetus 856/2012 ↗Chemical-spill containment and drainage where applicable.